Use meaningfull testcase names #1

New Issue

Simon · 2021-09-05T12:45:08+02:00

Simon commented

2021-09-05 12:45:08 +02:00

We should avoid using test case named like "Should work as intended":

intended doesn't describe the specifications and can't help one to understand what is correct or not. (tacite documentation)
test case is loosely binded to a specification reference. Feature or UC #nnnn
test case doesn't describe the test topic and scope. Testing user login feature

We should avoid using test case named like "Should work as intended": * *intended* doesn't describe the specifications and can't help one to understand what is correct or not. (tacite documentation) * test case is loosely binded to a specification reference. *Feature or UC #nnnn* * test case doesn't describe the test topic and scope. *Testing user login feature*

Simon added this to the Improve the cypress project milestone 2021-09-05 12:45:08 +02:00

Simon added the

bug

label 2021-09-05 12:45:08 +02:00

Simon referenced this issue from a commit

2021-09-05 13:13:24 +02:00

fix(#1): :white_check_mark: Renamed the testcase to be more explicite.

Simon referenced a pull request that will close this issue

2021-09-05 13:19:54 +02:00

Fix various issues in the current Milestone #5

Simon closed this issue

2022-06-30 00:37:03 +02:00